This means that many personal injury cases which were previously heard in the Court of Session will now be heard by the new All Scotland Personal Injury Court. Specialist personal injury Sheriffs have been appointed; Sheriffs Paul Arthurian QC, Peter Braid, Gordon Liddle, Katherine Mackie, and Fiona Reith QC.
The court rules are similar to those for personal injury cases in the Court of Session. The main changes are the introduction of e-motions and jury trials to the Sheriff Court. E-motions ought to bring greater efficiency to the court, as they can be intimated, opposed and granted more quickly, and some can be considered and granted by clerks exercising their quasi judicial role. It will be possible to have cases heard by juries in the new court as well.
The court is based in Edinburgh, where renovations to the Sheriff Court building have enabled the All Scotland Personal Injury Court to be created from the former agents' room. It looks quite different now, with its stylish bench and spacious jury box, than it did in the days when it was packed full of agents gossiping about their latest victories and enjoying the best toast in the capital.
What is our experience of the new court?
We have seen fewer cases raised in the new court than we would have expected. This is partly due to the fact that some pursuers' agents raised a large number of cases in the Court of Session immediately prior to the limit change, thus clearing out the backlog. It is also due to some pursuers opting to raise personal injury cases in their own local Sheriff Court, rather than in the new court in Edinburgh. Once agents build up confidence in the new court, this may well change.
Given we have seen fewer cases raised than expected, our solicitors have spent more time admiring the new facilities while at a drinks reception to celebrate its opening. It does bring with it more opportunities for solicitors conducting advocacy themselves in cases. The team at MF are looking forward to doing so, particularly if it means they are able to fulfil every litigator's dream of addressing a jury!
Related Insights
Article
Energised approach to contract interpretation
A commercial judge in the Court of Session has ruled in favour of a windfarm landlord, obliging the tenant to pay additional rent due to payments it received for reducing electricity generation during periods of low demand: Glenfiddich Wind Limited v Dorenell Windfarm Limited.
Article
Interim interdicts a lesson for the unwary!
In Martin McGowan v Springfield Properties Ltd, the Court awarded £558,033 in damages after a contractor was wrongfully restrained by an interim interdict for five years. The case highlights that parties obtaining interdicts have a duty to remove them when no longer necessary and that damages can include loss of earnings, reputational harm, and distress. Springfield has indicated it intends to appeal.