This means that many personal injury cases which were previously heard in the Court of Session will now be heard by the new All Scotland Personal Injury Court. Specialist personal injury Sheriffs have been appointed; Sheriffs Paul Arthurian QC, Peter Braid, Gordon Liddle, Katherine Mackie, and Fiona Reith QC.
The court rules are similar to those for personal injury cases in the Court of Session. The main changes are the introduction of e-motions and jury trials to the Sheriff Court. E-motions ought to bring greater efficiency to the court, as they can be intimated, opposed and granted more quickly, and some can be considered and granted by clerks exercising their quasi judicial role. It will be possible to have cases heard by juries in the new court as well.
The court is based in Edinburgh, where renovations to the Sheriff Court building have enabled the All Scotland Personal Injury Court to be created from the former agents' room. It looks quite different now, with its stylish bench and spacious jury box, than it did in the days when it was packed full of agents gossiping about their latest victories and enjoying the best toast in the capital.
What is our experience of the new court?
We have seen fewer cases raised in the new court than we would have expected. This is partly due to the fact that some pursuers' agents raised a large number of cases in the Court of Session immediately prior to the limit change, thus clearing out the backlog. It is also due to some pursuers opting to raise personal injury cases in their own local Sheriff Court, rather than in the new court in Edinburgh. Once agents build up confidence in the new court, this may well change.
Given we have seen fewer cases raised than expected, our solicitors have spent more time admiring the new facilities while at a drinks reception to celebrate its opening. It does bring with it more opportunities for solicitors conducting advocacy themselves in cases. The team at MF are looking forward to doing so, particularly if it means they are able to fulfil every litigator's dream of addressing a jury!
Related Insights
Article
AI in the Court System: Useful Guidance on the Use of AI for Expert Witnesses
Guidance from the Academy of Experts confirms that artificial intelligence can support, but not replace, expert judgment in legal proceedings. Skilled witnesses must understand, assess and take responsibility for any use of AI, applying risk-based safeguards that protect their independence and duties to the court.
Article
Opt-Out Group Proceedings and Consumer Class Actions
Following on from our recent update on opt-out group proceedings, the Law Commission of England & Wales is embarking on a project to consider the benefits and risks associated with the introduction of a "consumer class actions" regime with the aims of improving access to justice, ensuring damages are distributed to the affected class, and promoting cost efficient litigation.
Article
Artificial Intelligence in the Courtroom
This article examines a recent Sheriff Court decision on jurisdiction in housing disputes and the court’s approach to procedural competence. It also explores the court’s clear warning on the uncritical use of AI-generated material in legal submissions and the wider implications for litigants, practitioners and court resources.