Read the full article below or download your copy using the functionality within issuu.
Fri 13 Jul 2018
Since at least the mid 19th century, the English courts have admitted a common law principle of insolvency law referred to in contemporary parlance as the "anti-deprivation rule" (the "ADR"), and known historically as "fraud on the bankruptcy laws"1. The basic premise of the ADR is that a device through which a bankrupt estate is denuded of an asset in fraud of the bankruptcy laws is in essence void as a matter of policy.
Read the full article below or download your copy using the functionality within issuu.
The UK Supreme Court has brought clarity to the scope of fraudulent trading under Section 213 of the Insolvency Act 1986 in the case of Bilta (UK) Ltd (in liquidation) and others v. Tradition Financial Services Ltd. The judgment adopts an expansive interpretation of who may be held liable under Section 213, confirming that liability is not limited solely to company insiders, but also extends to third parties who knowingly participate in fraudulent trading.
Can the spouse of an executor claim to be an 'entitled resident' in the context of a 'calling-up' of a standard security? That was the question for the Sheriff Appeal Court in Soofi, Appellant. The answer from the Sheriff Appeal Court was no, but the case raises some interesting points for lenders to consider who may qualify as a 'debtor' or 'proprietor' under the Conveyancing and Feudal Reform (Scotland) Act 1970.
In this article, we examine the decision of the Court of Session in Karen Duncan's judicial review. This case is significant as it marks the first instance of a judicial review being brought against a determination made under the Fatal Accidents and Sudden Deaths etc (Scotland) Act 2016.
From our offices we serve the whole of Scotland, as well as clients around the world with interests in Scotland. Please complete the form below, and a member of our team will be in touch shortly.